Legal Opinion

Waterman Steamship Corporation v. Gay Cottons

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 6, 1969No. 21767_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:

Appellees, the successful parties on appeal, have timely filed the following cost bill pursuant to Rule 39(c), F.R.App.P.

1. Fee of Clerk for copy of record on appeal $ 25.56

2. Cost of reporter’s transcript 543.40

3. Cost of printing brief for appellees 596.26

4. Proctor’s docket fee. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920(5), 1923 100.00

Total $1,265.21

Item 2 is taxable in the district court. Rule 39(e), F.R.App.P.; Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Church, 9 Cir., 1969, 413 F.2d 1126.

Appellant attacks item 3, relying on 28 U.S.C. § 1923(c), which limits to $75.00 the costs allowable for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Douglas D. Church, Doing Business as Modern SpecialistCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Panagiotis Kotsopoulos v. Asturia Shipping Co., S.A., Hadjilias & Co., Ltd., and the S/t Mercury, Her Engines, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  2. The People Of The State Of California v. The Italian Motorship IliceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  3. McKelvy v. Metal Container Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1989
  4. Rawson v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1988
  5. Toner v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API