Legal Opinion

Grimes & Hauer, Inc. v. Pollock

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court

Decided March 19, 1953No. 645411PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*500OPINION

By BAUMANN, J:

Plaintiff is a corporation engaged in the processing of poultry and its sale through company operated retail stores. In the Cleveland area it has seven such outlets with a total of twenty-four employees. Five of the outlets are percentage concessions in Kresge’s stores. The defendants are representatives of the local union whose membership includes a very substantial number of the persons employed in the industry. None of plaintiff’s employees are or have been members of the union.

The union began active efforts to organize the plaintiff’s business about January 1st, 1952.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Federation of Labor v. SwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Hughes v. Superior Court of Cal. for Contra Costa Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Senn v. Tile Layers Protective UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grimes & Hauer, Inc. v. PollockOhio Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Richman Bros. v. Amalgamated Clothing WorkersCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API