Legal Opinion

Grimes & Hauer, Inc. v. Pollock

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 1953No. 22855PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas, granting plaintiff a permanent injunction enjoining and restraining the defendants from picketing, bannering or patrolling the streets or sidewalks adjacent to plaintiff’s places of business in Cuyahoga County.

Two grounds of error are assigned: (1) that the court lacked jurisdiction; (2) that the court erred in granting the injunction.

Decided May 26, 1954.

The essential facts are not in dispute. It is conceded that the picketing was for organizational purposes, there being no solicitation of plaintiff’s…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Grimes & Hauer, Inc. v. PollockCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1953

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Richman Bros. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of AmericaOhio Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. Richman Bros. v. Amalgamated Clothing WorkersCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API