Moore v. Saginaw, Tuscola & Huron Railroad

This case was once before in this ‘court, and reversed. 115 Mich. 103. The evidence is substantially the same as upon the former trial.

1. That opinion very fully stated the law governing the case. The court, in its instructions to the jury, followed that opinion, and fairly submitted the case to the jury, who again rendered a verdict for the plaintiff. The principal point now urged against the judgment is that there was no evidence of negligence, because the record fails to show how the force was communicated to the passenger car in which the plaintiff was about to take his seat, or what that…