Freeman v. Pere Marquette Railroad
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ionia; Davis, J. Case by Alonzo O. Freeman against the Pere Marquette Railroad Company for personal injuries. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This is an action for negligent injury to a passenger, in which the plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment of $200, and defendant brings error.
The plaintiff became a passenger in a caboose attached to a freight train. Before entering the caboose, he accepted and signed a ticket in which he agreed to exercise the highest degree of care to protect himself from injury, and agreed, if injured notwithstanding such care, to make no claim against the company. The defendant, however, does not, in the brief filed in this court, rely upon this contract as conclusive of plaintiff’s rights; but it is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- N. & W. R. R. v. FergusonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1884
- Harris v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
- Moore v. Saginaw, Tuscola & Huron RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Smith v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- Stoody v. Detroit, Grand Rapids & Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pasley v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
- Coon v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- Coon v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1936