Legal Opinion
Colorado River Cutthroat Trout v. Dirk Kempthorne
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 7, 2006No. Civil Action 00-2497(PLF)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL .L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. It arises from the decision of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”) to reject plaintiffs’ December 9, 1999 petition to list the Colorado River cutthroat trout under the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq. Specifically, plaintiffs assert.that the FWS’s April 20, 2004 Finding on the Petition violated mandatory ESA procedures and standards specific to 90-day findings and failed to consider applicable ESA substantive requirements for listing…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Colorado River Cutthroat Trout v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- WildEarth Guardians v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Air Transport Ass'n of America, Inc. v. National Mediation BoardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Buffalo Field Campaign v. ZinkeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Baptist Memorial Hospital-Golden Triangle v. LeavittDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.