Legal Opinion

Ware v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 28, 2011No. 1D09-3015PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

In this probation revocation ease, the state properly concedes that the trial court’s written order does not conform to the court’s oral pronouncement concerning the conditions of probation Appellant violated. Additionally, we agree with Appellant that the trial court abused its discretion in determining that Appellant violated his probation by committing the offense of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon because the record does not contain sufficient non-hearsay evidence to support this finding. However, we need not remand for reconsideration based on this error because it is clear…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cohen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. McKenzie v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  3. Ware v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  4. Arnau v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  5. Octavius Ware v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API