Legal Opinion

Holmes Projector Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 15, 1952No. 50149PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

As shown in the findings, the plaintiff’s income for 1945 was derived from contracts with the United States. These contracts provided that the prices specified therein should be paid to plaintiff by the defendant as such contracts were performed, but each contract contained a provision, pursuant to the Renegotiation Act of 1943, 59 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1191, that after performance such prices would be subject to renegotiation for the purpose of eliminating therefrom such profits as were found upon renegotiation to be excessive. The full face amount payable under such…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Continental Tie & Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Harrold v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Cromling v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
  4. Chestnut Securities Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945
  5. Hershey Creamery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Junior Toy Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  2. Midvale Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  3. Continental Foundry & MacHine Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  4. Continental Foundry & Machine Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  5. Gar Wood Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API