Legal Opinion

Junior Toy Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 1, 1953No. 50421, 50480-50485, 3-52, 222-52PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

The plaintiffs, all corporations, had war contracts with the United States, and each of the contracts with which these cases are concerned were subject to renegotiation under the applicable Acts of Congress, whereby the profits to which plaintiffs would be entitled upon completion would be finally determined, and appropriate income tax adjustments made in the year or years of performance, Section 3806, Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. § 3806, in the year of renegotiation, in the event it was determined that the contractor had received excessive profits under the contracts.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Holmes Projector Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Midvale Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  2. Continental Foundry & MacHine Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  3. Continental Foundry & Machine Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  4. Gar Wood Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  5. McDonnell Aircraft Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API