Legal Opinion

Kimbrell v. Mills & Young Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 9, 1915No. 9062PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Before MoorB, J., Yorkville, Summer term, 1914. Action by E. W. Kimbrell Company against Mills & Young Company. From a judgment in favor of defendant by the Circuit Court on appeal from a magistrate’s Court.

Read the full summary

Before MoorB, J., Yorkville, Summer term, 1914. Action by E. W. Kimbrell Company against Mills & Young Company. From a judgment in favor of defendant by the Circuit Court on appeal from a magistrate’s Court. The facts are stated in the judgment of the Circuit Court, as follows: On March 13, 1913, to secure the payment of his note, “for value received,” in the sum of $450, to plaintiff, made payable, due November 1, 1913, bearing interest after maturity at 8 per cent, per annum, payable annually, as well as “any other debt which I may now owe or may hereafter contract with the said E. W.…

1Opinion of the Court

The .opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chiee Justice Gary.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed for the reasons therein assigned.

FooTNorE.—As to sufficiency of the description in mortgages of crops, see Livingsion v. S. A. L. Ry., ante, and note 23 L. R. A. 458 to 460.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clowney v. RiversSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  2. Garris v. Commercial Credit CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  3. Garris v. Commercial Credit CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  4. Smith v. MixonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API