Legal Opinion · Dissent

Garris v. Commercial Credit Company

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 29, 1929No. 12622Published

1DissentJustice Cothran

(dissenting) : I agree with his Honor, Judge Johnson, in directing a verdict in favor of the Commercial Credit Company, upon the ground that the description of the mortgaged property, in the mortgage of Hartzog, was too' indefinite to constitute constructive notice by recording.

The contest is really between the Commercial Credit Company and Hartzog as to the priority of their respective mortgages. The question between them is not so much one of constructive notice by the recordation, as it is of the propriety of recording Hartzog’s mortgage at all.

It appears that one Asendorf was a dealer in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Northwestern Bank v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Ormsby Bros. v. NolanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  3. Robinson v. Saxon MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  4. People's Bank of Rock Hill v. People's Bank of AndersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  5. Commercial Savings Bank v. Brooklyn Lumber & Grain Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API