Higgins v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services Branch
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
13 P.3d 531 (2000)
170 Or. App. 542
In the Matter of Denial of the Application for the Custom Plates "Wine" "Invino" "Vino" of Michael Paul HIGGINS, Petitioner,
v.
DRIVER AND MOTOR VEHICLE SERVICES BRANCH (DMV), Respondent.
(60486; CA A96871)
Court of Appeals of Oregon, En banc.
Argued and Submitted September 9, 1998.
Resubmitted September 20, 2000.
Decided October 25, 2000.
Edmund J. Spinney, Springfield, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was the American Civil Liberties Foundation of Oregon, Inc.
David Schuman, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Edmonds; Concurrence · Wollheim; Dissent.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Rust v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Wooley v. MaynardSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Regan v. Taxation With Representation of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.