Legal Opinion

Aalund v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 2001No. 20000208PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Clyde Aalund appealed a judgment affirming a Workers Compensation Bureau order adopting an administrative law judge’s recommendation that he willfully made material, false statements on reimbursement claims to the Bureau. We hold the Bureau did not err in admitting deposition testimony at the administrative hearing, and the Bureau’s finding Clyde willfully made material, false statements on reimbursement claims is supported by a preponderance of the evidence. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] The Bureau accepted Clyde’s claim for benefits for a work-related injury incurred in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Vetter v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Hausauer v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Lende v. North Dakota Workers' Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Dodds v. North Dakota State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Snyder v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Sjostrand v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Fettig v. Workplace Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Barnes v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API