Legal Opinion

Geressy v. Digital Equipment Corp.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided January 13, 1997No. 0:94-cv-01427PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ON THE JURY CHARGE ON PUNITIVE DAMAGES

WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge:

I. Introduction

Both defendant and plaintiffs seek post-verdict relief. In this memorandum, only the punitive damage issue is addressed. Over the course of almost four weeks, a jury heard evidence and arguments in a case involving three plaintiffs who had allegedly suffered from repetitive stress injuries as a result of using defendant’s computer equipment. Defective design and failure to warn were the bases for the suit. Their spouses filed independent loss of consortium claims.

The case was divided into two…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Savino Dagnello v. Long Island Rail Road CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  4. James K. Lee v. Michael EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  5. Zurich Insurance v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ginny v. White Jimmie D. White v. Ford Motor Company, a Delaware Corporation, and Orscheln Company, a Missouri CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Greenbaum v. Svenska Handelsbanken, NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  3. Energetic Tank, Inc. v. UnknownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
  4. Ginny v. White Jimmie D. White v. Ford Motor Company, a Delaware Corporation, and Orscheln Company, a Missouri CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API