Legal Opinion

Prater v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 18, 1972PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CATINNA, Commissioner.

Estill Prater and Farrell Smith were jointly indicted on counts of breaking and entering and grand larceny. Prater and Smith were found guilty on the count of grand larceny and each sentenced to three years. No appeal was prosecuted. Prater and Smith filed a motion to vacate the judgment pursuant to RCr 11.42; the motion was overruled without an evidentiary hearing. This appeal seeks a reversal of the order denying the motion to vacate. Numerous grounds for reversal are asserted, but there is no merit to any ground except that claiming denial of the right to a direct…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rodriquez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Hammershoy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
  3. Stinnett v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Blankenship v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977
  2. Haskins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1973
  3. Jones v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1979
  4. Gerald Faught v. Henry E. Cowan, Warden, Kentucky State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  5. Gerald Faught v. Henry E. Cowan, Warden, Kentucky State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API