Arwin Sportswear Co. v. Salerno
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
Sections 1120 and 1124 of the Civil" Practice Act were not complied with insofar as the second cause of action is concerned. These provisions are mandatory (Kram v. Manufacturers Trust Co., 238 App. Div. 680). Moreover, there is not a sufficient basis in the record to support the damages awarded in either cause of action. The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered on all issues, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.
Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ., concur; Dore, J. P., concurs in result.
Judgment unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered on all issues,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kram v. Manufacturers Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tollin v. EllebyCivil Court of the City of New York · 1974
- Clements v. WalkerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1956