Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Langis v. Byrne

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 18, 1930No. 1 Div. 604PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

“Hard labor for the county shall be under the superintendence and control of the court of county commissioners, or board of revenue, who shall determine in what manner and on what particular works the labor shall be performed, and all convicts sentenced to hard labor for the county shall be under the direction and control of the court of county commissioners, or board of revenue, when worked or hired in the county where convicted, but otherwise they are to be under the superintendence and control of the board of administration.” Section 3676, Code 1923.

“The court of county commissioners,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Robertson v. SichelSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Buckalew v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  3. State v. KolbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  4. Powers v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  5. Sloss-S. S. & I. Co. v. WeirSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tuscaloosa County v. ShamblinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Carter v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  3. Holland v. Fidelity Deposit Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BassCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. United States Fidelity And Guaranty Company v. Ray D. BassCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API