Brach Van Houten Holding, Inc. v. Save Brack's Coalition
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KOOORAS, District Judge:
This matter is before the Court on a motion for a preliminary injunction. For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
The plaintiffs, Brach Van Houten Holding, Inc. and E.J. Brach Corporation (collectively, “Brach’s”), move for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the defendant, Save Brach’s Coalition for Chicago (“Save Brach’s”), from incorporating Brach’s trademark logo into Save Brach’s promotional materials.
Save Brach’s is a coalition whose goal is to prevent Brach’s from closing its candy factory on the West Side of Chicago. Their…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Roland MacHinery Company v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Lloyd Corp. v. TannerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- First National Maintenance Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders, Inc. v. Pussycat Cinema, Ltd. And Michael ZaffaranoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Mobil Oil Corporation v. Pegasus Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- SEIU Healthcare 775NW v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Foxworthy v. Custom Tees, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1995
- American Family Life Insurance v. HaganDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2002
- United We Stand America, Inc. v. United We Stand, America New York, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- United We Stand America, Inc. v. United We Stand, America New York, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.