Legal Opinion
Wise v. Tidal Construction Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 8, 2004No. A04A1943PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Andrews, Presiding Judge.
Mary Rose Wise and Nell Lackman, her mother, appeal from the trial court’s direction of a verdict in favor of Tidal Construction Company, Inc. (Tidal) in their suit arising from claimed defective construction of a home owned by them.
“A directed verdict is authorized only when there is no conflict in the evidence as to any material issue and the evidence introduced, with all reasonable deductions therefrom, shall demand a particular verdict.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Carden v. Burckhalter, 214 Ga. App. 487, 488 (1) (b) (448 SE2d 251) (1994). On appeal, we…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- NEDA Construction Co. v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- GEORGIA NORTHEASTERN R. CO., INC. v. LuskSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Empire Mills Co. v. Burrell Engineering & Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Patillo v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Wise v. Tidal Const. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Considine v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- NORFOLK BELT LINE R. CO. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 2008
- John Thurmond & Associates, Inc. v. KennedySupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
- John Thurmond & Associates, Inc. v. KennedySupreme Court of Georgia · 2008