Osborne v. Van Dyke
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] This case involves a claim for compensation under the workmen's compensation act. Defendant William Van Dyke is an employer subject to the workmen's compensation act, including household domestic servants. Defendant Louise Van Dyke is his wife, not subject to the workmen's compensation act. Defendant Hartford Accident Indemnity Company is the insurer covering liability of William Van Dyke under the act. Nettie Osborne, plaintiff herein, was a household domestic…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Oleszek v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Bross v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Brabon v. Gladwin Light & Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Cell v. Yale & Towne Manfg. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Dailey v. River Raisin Paper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Viaene v. MikelMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Dershowitz v. Ford Motor CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1950