Czeczeli v. Department of H.R.S.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

In the initial brief filed by the appellant in this termination of parental rights case, appellant’s court-appointed counsel advised this *724court that he had read the record and discovered no meritorious issues for appeal. He then requested the court to employ the procedure set forth in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, reh’g denied, 388 U.S. 924, 87 S.Ct. 2094, 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967), pertaining to indigent appeals in criminal cases.

H.R.S. then filed a motion- to dismiss this appeal. Counsel for the appellant filed a response to the motion…