Legal Opinion

Barton v. New York City Commission on Human Rights

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1988PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Helen E. Freedman, J.

The issue to be determined in this proceeding is whether the New York City Commission on Human Rights (NYCCHR, *555Commission or Human Rights Commission) was justified in finding that a dentist engaged in discriminatory practices when he terminated an agreement with another dentist to whom he leased operatory space because the latter treated patients with Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS).

Petitioner, Lawrence A. Barton, D.D.S., was charged with and found guilty of discrimination on the basis of handicap in violation of section 8-107 (5) (b) and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Trafficante v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Bernstein v. ToiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. New York State Club Ass'n v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. City of New York v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. LagoudakisMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Petri v. Bank of New York Co.New York Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Bernstein v. 1995 AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Bernstein v. 1995 AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Bartman v. ShenkerNew York Supreme Court · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API