Legal Opinion

Kirkpatrick v. Collins

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1917No. 13890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Mackintosh, J., entered June 28, 1916, upon findings in favor of the defendant, refusing to remove a cloud upon title, and foreclosing a mortgage upon defendant’s cross-complaint, after a trial on the merits to the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Parker, J. —

This action was commenced in the superior court for King county by the plaintiff, Mrs. Kirkpatrick, seeking to remove a cloud upon her title to four lots, in the city of Seattle, consisting of a mortgage thereon, executed by her grantor, Mrs. Prances Webb, to the defendants Katherine Collins and husband, to secure the payment of a debt of $700 due from her to them, evidenced by a promissory note which is now alleged to be barred by the statute of limitations. The defendants, Mrs. Collins and husband, filed an *400answer and cross-complaint seeking foreclosure of the mortgage, making…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Taplin & Rowell v. ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1915
  2. Schlotfeldt v. BullWashington Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. GrossWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. State v. CoffeyWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Waddell v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Dennis v. TrickWashington Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API