Legal Opinion

Grayson v. LaBranche

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 27, 1967No. 5529PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.

Contracts for the purchase and sale of real estate which are subject to subsequent or future financing provisions have proved to be a fertile breeding ground for litigation. Annots. 5 A.L.R. 2d 287; 81 A.L.R. 2d 1338; Aiken, “ Subject to Financing ” Clauses in Interim Contracts for Sale of Realty, 43 Marq. L. Rev. 265 (1960); Raushenbush, Problems and Practices with Financing Conditions in Real Estate Purchase Contracts, 1963 Wis. L. Rev. 566. While pristine preciseness in financing provisions may be recommended to attorneys and real estate brokers, this quality is frequently missing in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. DutcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Starr v. HolckMichigan Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Spectrum Enterprises, Inc. v. Helm Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  2. Sawin v. CarrSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  3. Makris v. NolanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  4. Rogers v. Cardinal Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  5. Gaynes v. AllenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API