Legal Opinion

Garrett Transfer & Storage Co. v. Pfost

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1933No. 6031PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

Appellant engaged in the general auto transportation business, both interstate and intrastate, questions the constitutionality of subsection h, section 2, chapter 185, 1931 Session Laws, page 309 (now subsec. h, sec. 48-127, I. C. A.), and section 8, chapter 267, 1929 Session Laws, page 619 (now sec. 59-811, I. C. A.) and seeks to enjoin the enforcement of said statutes.

Respondent challenges equitable interference with the enforcement of a criminal statute. The complaint alleges the plaintiff has no plain, speedy or adequate remedy at law, that prosecutions would be brought for every…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Terrace v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Walla Walla City v. Walla Walla Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Packard v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. UTAH POWER & LIGHT CO. v. PFOST, COMMISSIONER OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Rich v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Johnson v. DiefendorfIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Idaho Gold Dredging Co. v. BalderstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Eberle v. NielsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  5. State Ex Rel. Graham v. EnkingIdaho Supreme Court · 1938

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API