Legal Opinion
Pridgen v. Baugh & Sons Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 14, 1929No. 2782PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WADDILL, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a decree of the District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington, dismissing a bill in equity filed by appellant against appellee, seeking recovery of the sum of $13,000 and interest.
Appellant, Mrs. J. V. Pridgen, the administratrix of the estate of C. C. Pridgen, deceased, instituted suit in equity in the superi- or court of Columbus county, North Carolina, against appellee, Baugh & Sons Company, which cause was removed to the United States District Court at Wilmington. The amount sought to be recovered represents the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Shaw v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Murray v. LardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Hotchkiss v. National BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Manufacturing Co. v. . SummersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. v. Hamilton Nat. Bank, for Use and Benefit of Employers' Liability Assur. Corp., LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
- Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. v. Hamilton Nat. Bank, for Use and Benefit of Employers' Liability Assur. Corp., LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952