Legal Opinion

Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. v. Hamilton Nat. Bank, for Use and Benefit of Employers' Liability Assur. Corp., Limited

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 7, 1952No. 11322Published

1Opinion of the Court

199 F.2d 127

STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORP. et al.

v.

HAMILTON NAT. BANK, for Use and Benefit of EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ASSUR. CORP., Limited.

No. 11322.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Decided October 7, 1952.

J. H. Doughty, Knoxville, Tenn. (Hodges & Doughty, Knoxville, Tenn., on the brief), for appellants.

Howard F. Jarvis, Knoxville, Tenn. (Jennings, O'Neil & Jarvis, Knoxville, Tenn., on the brief), for appellee.

Before MARTIN, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

MARTIN, Circuit Judge.

1

In a court action tried in the United States District Court for Eastern Tennessee, judgment for…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. Standard Oil Co. Of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Shaw v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Murray v. LardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  5. National Metropolitan Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API