Legal Opinion

Munger Oil & Cotton Co. v. City of Groesbeck

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 28, 1917No. 7794PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTalbot, J.

This suit was instituted by Hunger Oil & Cotton Company, a private corporation, hereinafter designated the “oil company,” against the city of Groesbeck, a municipal corporation, incorporated and operating under the general laws of the state as a city of more than 1,000 inhabitants, herein called the “city,” for the purpose of restraining the city and its officers from enforcing an order of the city to abate a certain wooden building situated on lots 9 and 10 in block 33 in the city of Groesbeck owned by the oil company and used by it as a cotton seed house. The court granted a temporary…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Austin v. Austin City Cemetery Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Evison v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Connor v. City of University ParkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  2. City of University Park v. HoblitzelleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Barrington v. City of ShermanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. Scruggs v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Harvey v. City of SeymourCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API