Legal Opinion

Howton v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 22, 1926No. 6 Div. 620PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

Suit on verified account by appellee against appellant. As originally instituted the suit was against Jack H. Howton and Sam Wallace, partners doing business as Howton & Wallace, and against the firm. Pleas were filed by the two individual defendants denying the existence of any partnership, whereupon the plaintiff, with leave of the court, amended the complaint so as to strike therefrom said Wallace as a party to the cause, and also the partnership and any reference thereto, thus leaving the complaint as against Jack H. Howton alone.

The first five assignments of error challenge the action of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bush v. BumgardnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Plunkett v. DendySupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Alexander v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. McCaskey & Ratcliff v. Pollock & CoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  5. Beitman v. Birmingham Paint & Glass Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dortch Baking Co. v. SchoelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  2. Whisenant v. WillinghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API