Legal Opinion

Katranis v. Aurea-Aspasia Corp.

Massachusetts District Court

Decided April 11, 1949Published

1Opinion of the CourtEno, J.

This is an action of contract by which the plaintiff seeks to recover the sum of $335.70 for work done and materials furnished according to an account annexed. The defendant filed a plea in abatement for the reason that neither the writ nor the summons described the nature of the claim. This plea in abatement was overruled and no report was claimed by the defendant. The defendant also filed a general denial.

At the trial, the plaintiff, without any previous notice to the defendant to produce a bill rendered by him to the defendant, offered in evidence a duplicate original thereof. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bendett v. BendettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Leonard v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. Riley v. BoehmMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  4. Taylor v. HarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  5. Chadwick & Carr Co. v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API