Legal Opinion

Wiebke v. Erickson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 19, 1933No. 29,104PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSEN, Justice.

Plaintiffs appeal from an order denying their alternative motion for judgment or a new trial after verdict in favor of defendants. The action was brought to recover on three promissory notes. The defense interposed was that the claimed indebtedness and the notes sued upon were obtained by plaintiffs by fraud and fraudulent representations.

The assignments of error are that the court erred in denying plaintiffs’ motion for a directed verdict in their favor, in denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and in denying their motion for a new trial.

The first…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Humphrey v. SieversSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  2. Moe v. ShafferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  3. Farmers State Bank v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. Tysdal v. BerghSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Barron v. StrimlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Wiebke v. MannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API