Legal Opinion

State v. Ward

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 18, 1970No. 7013SC574PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the failure of the court to define self-defense as it related to each of the offenses of which he could have been found guilty. The definition of self-defense was given completely and correctly following the definition of assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill inflicting serious injury. After defining the crime of assault with a firearm inflicting serious injury, the court instructed the jury that if they were not satisfied of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, they should return a verdict of not guilty, “bearing in mind, ladies and gentlemen…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. RobbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. State v. BarrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. State v. HooverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cooper v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  2. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API