State v. Ward
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
Defendant assigns as error the failure of the court to define self-defense as it related to each of the offenses of which he could have been found guilty. The definition of self-defense was given completely and correctly following the definition of assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill inflicting serious injury. After defining the crime of assault with a firearm inflicting serious injury, the court instructed the jury that if they were not satisfied of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, they should return a verdict of not guilty, “bearing in mind, ladies and gentlemen…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. RobbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. BarrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. HooverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cooper v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971