Legal Opinion
United States v. Clark
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 10, 2012No. 11-2270PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.
Jason Clark appeals his conviction for aggravated identity theft based on the sufficiency of the evidence to support conviction for that offense and the district court’s admission of certain prior acts evidence. Because the district court 1 did not err by denying Clark’s motion for judgment of acquittal or abuse its discretion by admitting the prior acts evidence, we affirm the conviction.
I
Clark was charged with the following offenses: bank fraud conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 1349, two counts of bank fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1344, identity theft under 18 U.S.C. § 1028,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Flores-Figueroa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. Ronald F. CalvertCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Ronald R. ErdmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Donald Wayne YellowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Wicahpe George MilkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Padilla v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. (In Re Padilla)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
- United States v. Steven MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. James Robert CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Jorge Sainz NavarreteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Bret TschacherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.