State ex rel. Horne v. Great Lakes Construction Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentHolmes, J.
In my view, the precise question presented for review is whether an employee suffers from temporary total disability
*82under R.C. 4123.56 when he is able to perform less burdensome duties for his employer, but is prevented from returning to his former, more strenuous, position of employment. While I agree that an analysis herein necessarily includes a review of this court’s holding in State, ex rel. Ramirez, v. Indus. Comm. (1982), 69 Ohio St. 2d 630 [23 O.O.3d 518], I differ from the majority in that I believe a realignment of the pertinent law is warranted. Therefore, I dissent.
Relative to…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited31 opinions
- State ex rel. Ramirez v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Bower v. Whitehall Leather Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Medina v. Zia CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- Delano v. City of South PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Schober v. Mountain Bell TelephoneNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.