Isenhart v. Isenhart

The defendant-respondent, George Boyd Isenhart, has moved to dismiss this appeal upon two grounds. Before mentioning them, we take occasion to state that the challenged decree of the circuit court (1) dissolved the bonds of matrimony between the plaintiff-appellant and the defendant-respondent, and (2) after mentioning a residence property “located at 5536 Southwest Hamilton Street in Portland”, which it described by metes and bounds, it ordered that the property “shall be owned by the parties hereto as tenants in common, each party owning an undivided one-half interest therein”.

The two…