Gebers v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
In separate proceedings below, appellants filed proper person post-conviction petitions for writs of habeas corpus alleging, in part, that the attorneys that represented them in the proceedings leading to their convictions had provided ineffective assistance of counsel.1 The district court conducted hearings concerning appellants’ petitions. At both hearings, the district court received evidence and testimony, including testimony from appellants’ former counsel regarding the merits of the claims raised' in appellants’ petitions. Appellants, however, were not present at these hearings,…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Lozada v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. PlunkettNevada Supreme Court · 1943
- Hollis v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1980
4Cited by7 opinions
- State v. BennettNevada Supreme Court · 2003
- HARRIS (BARRY) v. WARDENNevada Supreme Court · 2024
- Lytle v. McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Clark (Darryl) v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Freeman (Jacoby) v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.