Legal Opinion · Dissent

City & County of San Francisco v. Regents of the University of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 25, 2017No. A144500Published

1Dissent

BANKE, J.,

Dissenting.—With the majority’s opinion, the law on whether a municipality can ask a state entity to collect a general local tax imposed not on the state entity, but on third parties doing business with the entity, is as follows: Irrigation districts providing electrical service (a proprietary activity because nonstate entities also produce electricity) can be required to collect a local utility users tax. (City of Modesto v. Modesto Irrigation Dist. (1973) 34 Cal.App.3d 504 [110 Cal.Rptr. 111] (City of Modesto)) Water districts providing water and sewer services (both governmental…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Moe v. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Willcutts v. BunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. United States v. County of FresnoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Hall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API