Legal Opinion · Dissent

Deutsch v. Max

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 4, 1935No. Appeal, 159Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew:

I am unable to agree with the opinion of the majority. It points to no case, in this Commonwealth or elsewhere, in which a landlord has been held liable to a servant of a tenant under circumstances such as are here presented. In my judgment, the result of the majority’s decision will be to open the door to innumerable fraudulent and unfounded claims and to impose an unduly heavy burden on landlords — a burden that is without sanction in the law.

The fundamental weakness of the majority opinion lies in its assumption, without discussion, that plaintiff, a…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Edwards v. . N.Y. H.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Cowen v. SunderlandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  3. McLaughlin v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  4. Call v. HaunTennessee Supreme Court · 1850
  5. Moore v. WeberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API