Legal Opinion

In re Skinkle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 3, 1928Published

1Per curiam

The petitioner was dismissed from his position as a member of the police department of the city of Waterviiet after a hearing before the commissioner of public safety. On an appeal to the Supreme Court at Special Term under section 148 of the Watervliet City Charter (Laws of 1918, chap. 462), the court reviewed the proceedings on the merits and ordered the reinstatement of the petitioner. An opinion was written. (Matter of Skinkle, 130 Misc. 8.) On appeal to this court from such decision we held that the Special Term exceeded its jurisdiction in reviewing on the merits when the charter…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mills v. . ParkhurstNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. In re Charges against SkinkleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  3. In re Charges against SkinkleNew York Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API