In re Charges against Skinkle
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
The respondent Skinkle, a police officer of Watervliet, on the trial of serious charges preferred against him, was found guilty by the commissioner of public safety, and he was fined and dismissed from his position. The city charter (Laws of 1918, chap. 462, § 148) provides that an officer aggrieved may take an appeal from the determination “to the Supreme Court, at any Special Term thereof, held within the judicial district in which the city is situated.” An appeal was taken and the order was reversed at a Special Term held in Albany county. (See 130 Misc. 8.) The order provided, in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matter of Commissioners of Central ParkNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Matter of BradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Manhattan Railway v. O'SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- People Ex Rel. Morrissey v. . WaldoNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- People ex rel. Winspear v. KreinhederAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Matter of SkinkleNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Shea v. ValentineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Mitchell v. MulrooneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- In re MerendinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- In re the Proceedings Pursuant to Section 9-a of Article VI of the New York State Constitution in Relation to FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.