Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. TIRPAK

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 19, 1970No. Appeals, 185, 189, 203, and 216PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Watkins, J.,

These are appeals from the judgments of the Court of Common Pleas of Washington County, by the defendant-appellants, Lilly Jane Florida, George E. Tirpak, Harry T. Collins, and Samuel G. Heckel, after conviction of possession of marijuana as proscribed by Section 4 of the Act of July 11, 1917, P.L. 758, as amended, 35 P.S. Section 780-4 (q); and from the denial by the court below of post-trial motions.

The defendants were sentenced as follows: Collins to a term of three (3) to twenty-three (23) months in the County Prison; and Florida, Tirpak, and Heckel to terms of three…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Commonwealth v. TownsendSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Commonwealth v. ClintonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Commonwealth v. CrawleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth of Pa. Ex Rel. Feiling v. SincavageDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Commonwealth v. DaschSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Commonwealth v. MathiesonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. La RosaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Commonwealth v. ConnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API