Legal Opinion
In Re Skulina Estate
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided March 5, 1991No. 114596Published
1Opinion of the Court
187 Mich. App. 649 (1991)
468 N.W.2d 322
In re SKULINA ESTATE
PECK
v.
BOEHNING
Docket No. 114596.
Michigan Court of Appeals.
Decided March 5, 1991, at 9:30 A.M.
Smith, Johnson, Brandt & Heintz, P.C. (by Patrick E. Heintz), for petitioners.
John B. Daugherty, and Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone (by Thomas J. Heiden and Meg Hackett Carrier), for respondent.
Before: NEFF, P.J., and MAHER and HOOD, JJ.
2Per curiam
Respondent appeals as of right from a judgment of the Manistee County Probate Court that ordered her to return to the estate of her deceased brother, Charles Skulina, the funds from jointly held bank…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Allen v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Thompson v. Mayes, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1986
- Pence v. WesselsMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Mitts v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Serkaian v. OzarMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.