Legal Opinion

Mitts v. Williams

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1947No. Docket No. 24, Calendar No. 43,793PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarr, C. J.

Plaintiff in this case, as administrator of.the estate of Sarah Jane Maleo, brought suit in the circuit court to recover money alleged- to belong to the estate, said money consisting of the proceeds of a savings account in the Old Kent Bank of Grand Rapids. Mrs. Maleo died October 13, 1945. Prior to her death the account stood in the joint names of Mrs. Maleo and her daughter, the defendant in the case. After the mother’s death defendant drew from the bank the balance of $1,453.29 remaining in the account. Plaintiff alleged in his declaration that the money was the sole property of Mrs. Maleo…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Van't Hof v. JemisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Hill v. HairstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Esling v. City National Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Whitney v. WheelerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  5. Egan v. GreceMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cebulak v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Pence v. WesselsMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Jacques v. JacquesMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Serkaian v. OzarMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Hazen v. ElmendorfMichigan Supreme Court · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API