Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Stein

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 2008No. 17,349PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

{1} This matter came before the Court to consider whether attorney Stuart L. Stein (Respondent) should be disbarred for violating the Rules of Professional Conduct through his actions associated with his representation of Bruce Clinesmith and his wife, Ruth Clinesmith. For the reasons that follow, we adopt the findings and conclusions of the hearing committee and adopt the recommendation of the disciplinary board to disbar Respondent from the practice of law.

I. BACKGROUND

{2} These disciplinary proceedings commenced with a letter sent by the Honorable Linda M. Vanzi of the Second…

3Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State v. BreitNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Deflon v. SawyersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Weeks v. Independent School District No. I-89Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  4. Woodson v. Phillips Petroleum Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Tom Growney Equipment Co. v. JouettNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by17 opinions

  1. in Re Verna Francis Coley ThetfordTexas Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Encinias v. Whitener Law Firm, P.A.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Tapia v. City of AlbuquerqueDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
  4. In Matter of ConvisserNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State ex rel. State Engineer v. San Juan Agricultural Water Users Ass'New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API