Legal Opinion

Speth v. City of Madison

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1946PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarlow, J.

Plaintiff in her complaint sets forth two causes of action against the city of Madison, one for punitive damages for removal and disturbance of bodies and desecration of tombs, and one for the unlawful sale and subsequent withholding of crypts in a mausoleum. She alleges that she is a grandniece and sole heir of one Charles German, deceased, and as such sole heir, and under the terms of his will, is the owner of crypts Nos. 158 and 162 in a mausoleum in Forest Hill cemetery in the city of Madison; that the mausoleum is privately owned but operated for the benefit of the public as a part of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ramsdale v. FooteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Cedar Lake Hotel Co. v. Cedar Creek Hydraulic Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Hollman v. City of PlattevilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  4. McIntyre v. CarrollWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sunnyside Feed Co., Inc. v. City of PortageCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
  2. Andersen v. Village of Little ChuteCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
  3. Traylor v. Marine CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1971
  4. Munger v. SeehaferCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2016
  5. Engelking v. Enbridge (U.S.), Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API