Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Eisenstecken v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 28, 2025No. 2:20-cv-02349Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 MONICA EISENSTECKEN; TAHOE No. 2:20-cv-02349-DJC-CKD STEWARDS, LLC; DAVID BENEDICT; 11 TAHOE FOR SAFER TECH; and ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH TRUST, 12 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ Plaintiffs, MOTIONS TO DISMISS 13 v. 14 TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING 15 AGENCY; JOANNE MARCHETTA, in her official and individual capacities; 16 MARSHA BERKBIGLER, in her official and individual capacities; SUE 17 NOVASEL, in her official and representative capacities; GUILLIAM 18 NEL; SACRAMENTO VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP dba VERIZON 19…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API