State v. Rigby
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
ROTH, Judge:
T1 Zachary Rigby appeals his conviction for driving with a measurable controlled substance in the body and possession or use of a controlled substance, both class B misdemeanors. Righy challenges the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence that the police found during a warrantless search of his vehicle. Rigby contends that the Utah Constitution provides its citizens greater protection against unreasonable searches than the United States Constitution because Utah courts have required police officers to have both probable cause and exigent cireum-stances when…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Christopher George StormSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- State v. HintzeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
- State v. BeamesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
- State v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
- State v. BeamesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.