State v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Presiding Judge:
¶ 1 Following a jury trial, Fuller Smith was convicted of two counts of molestation of a child and two counts of sexual conduct with a minor under fifteen. On appeal, Smith argues a DNA1 expert’s testimony as to the results of a saliva test violated his Confrontation Clause rights, the trial court violated his due process rights by denying Ms motion to dismiss with prejudice after two previous trials resulted in mistrials, and that insufficient evidence supported the jury’s verdicts. Because Smith’s Confrontation Clause rights were violated, we vacate Smith’s…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Gabriela AragonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2024
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Patricia Adams v. Hon. Brenden Griffin City Prosecutor's OfficeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2023
- State v. GormanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- State v. MontoyaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019