Legal Opinion
Hillsdale National Bank v. Sansone
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 8, 1950PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
8 N.J. Super. 497 (1950)
73 A.2d 362
THE HILLSDALE NATIONAL BANK OF HILLSDALE, NEW JERSEY, A NATIONAL BANKING INSTITUTION, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JOHN SANSONE, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided May 8, 1950.
Mr. Harry Randall, attorney for the plaintiff.
Mr. Joseph Grossman (Messrs. Grossman & Kampelman, attorneys), for the defendant.
WAESCHE, J.S.C.
This suit is on a promissory note. Plaintiff is the holder of the note. The defendant is the maker. The case was tried without a jury, and on a stipulation of the facts.
Under a conditional sales contract, dated August 2, 1948, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Neblett v. MacFarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Wells v. WellsIndiana Supreme Court · 1926
- Matthiessen & Weichers Refining Co. v. McMahon's AdministratorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1876
- Miller v. BarberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1905
- P. Ballantine & Sons v. GulkaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Weichert Co. Realtors v. RyanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Knight v. New England Mut. Life Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Hillsdale Nat. Bank v. SansoneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Brooklyn Trust Co. v. PodvinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951