Legal Opinion

Brown v. Queen City Supply Company

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided June 25, 2021No. 1:19-cv-00674Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION - CINCINNATI DARREN BROWN, 3 Case No. 1:19-cv-674 Plaintiff, 3 Judge Matthew W. McFarland v QUEEN CITY SUPPLY COMPANY d/b/a MQ AUTOMATION, Defendants. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 22) This matter is before the Court on Defendant Queen City Supply Company d/b/a MQ Automation (“MQ”)’'s motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 22.) Plaintiff filed a response in opposition (Doc. 27), to which MQ filed a reply (Doc. 30), making this matter ripe for review.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Shirley J. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOLEDO HOSPITAL, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  3. Mark Laster v. City of KalamazooCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  4. Henry Dicarlo v. John E. Potter, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  5. prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 11,133 Steven Gregg v. Allen-Bradley Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API